{"id":14114,"date":"2026-02-12T21:43:31","date_gmt":"2026-02-12T18:43:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/rocketseo.md\/blog\/auto-insurance-in-moldova-whos-top-on-google\/"},"modified":"2026-04-05T21:19:10","modified_gmt":"2026-04-05T18:19:10","slug":"auto-insurance-in-moldova-whos-top-on-google","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/rocketseo.md\/en\/auto-insurance-in-moldova-whos-top-on-google\/","title":{"rendered":"Auto Insurance in Moldova: Who’s Top on Google?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Purpose of the analysis: to show the potential of key search queries, the dynamics of organic traffic, identify market leaders, and determine market capacity.
<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The ranking includes websites found in Google search results that offer auto insurance services in Moldova.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The tables reflect traffic received over the last 30 days (December 2025).
<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Comparison of traffic from Google for the years 2024-2025<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n <\/colgroup>\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\u2116<\/th>Website<\/th>Traffic 2024<\/th>Traffic 2025<\/th>% of the total 2025<\/th><\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
1<\/td>rapidasig.md<\/td>23800<\/td>29100<\/td>+22%<\/td> <\/tr>\n
2<\/td>omnis.md<\/td>102<\/td>3500<\/td>+97%<\/td> <\/tr>\n
3<\/td>intact.md<\/td>358<\/td>3100<\/td>+88%<\/td> <\/tr>\n
4<\/td>totalasig.md<\/td>15<\/td>2200<\/td>+99%<\/td> <\/tr>\n
5<\/td>rca.md<\/td>4700<\/td>1500<\/td>-68%<\/td> <\/tr>\n
6<\/td>iasig.md<\/td>241<\/td>1400<\/td>+83%<\/td> <\/tr>\n
7<\/td>moldasig.md<\/td>620<\/td>1200<\/td>+48%<\/td> <\/tr>\n
8<\/td>grawe.md<\/td>952<\/td>1100<\/td>+13%<\/td> <\/tr>\n
9<\/td>globalasig.md<\/td>1500<\/td>960<\/td>-36%<\/td> <\/tr>\n
10<\/td>donaris.md<\/td>131<\/td>529<\/td>+75%<\/td> <\/tr>\n
11<\/td>asterra.md<\/td>423<\/td>373<\/td>-12%<\/td> <\/tr>\n
12<\/td>arion.md<\/td>331<\/td>195<\/td>-41%<\/td> <\/tr>\n
13<\/td>carteverde.md<\/td>0<\/td>161<\/td>+100%<\/td> <\/tr>\n
14<\/td>general.md<\/td>359<\/td>132<\/td>-63%<\/td> <\/tr>\n
15<\/td>acordgrup.md<\/td>37<\/td>112<\/td>+67%<\/td> <\/tr>\n
16<\/td>strahovanie.md<\/td>136<\/td>110<\/td>-19%<\/td> <\/tr>\n
17<\/td>garantie.md<\/td>68<\/td>55<\/td>-19%<\/td> <\/tr>\n
18<\/td>sunexpress.md<\/td>20<\/td>42<\/td>+52%<\/td> <\/tr>\n
19<\/td>novabroker.md<\/td>17<\/td>40<\/td>+48%<\/td> <\/tr>\n
20<\/td>elitasig.md<\/td>30<\/td>30<\/td>-0%<\/td> <\/tr>\n
21<\/td>bnaa.md<\/td>31<\/td>29<\/td>-6%<\/td> <\/tr>\n
22<\/td>superpolis.md<\/td>427<\/td>26<\/td>-94%<\/td> <\/tr>\n <\/tbody>\n <\/table>\n \n \n \n<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n

*Methodology and assumptions. <\/strong>Methodology and assumptions. For evaluation we use the analytics service Ahrefs – one of the most accurate tools on the market. However, its Organic Traffic metric is a model-based estimate derived from keyword positions and click-through rates, so it is often lower than actual traffic. In our own projects, the difference is typically 3\u20135x, which we regularly verify against GSC\/GA4.
Therefore, if Ahrefs reports a figure of, say, 1,000 visits, the actual volume may be 3,000+. This is not “inflation” – it is a limitation of the model: the tool does not capture part of the “long tail,” branded variations, local and fresh queries, Discover traffic, etc.

Please keep this assumption in mind when reading the figures: Ahrefs tends to be conservative.
<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

For clarity, the traffic volume data is displayed in a pie chart to illustrate who is capturing the largest share.
<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Non-Branded Traffic<\/strong><\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Non-branded traffic<\/strong> – refers to queries that do not include a brand name but are related to the services the company offers on the market. Examples include: asigurare auto, car insurance, MTPL Moldova, carte verde pret, car insurance Moldova, and similar queries.
<\/p>\n\n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n <\/colgroup>\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
Website<\/th>non-branded traffic 2024<\/th>% of the total 2024<\/th>non-branded traffic 2025<\/th>% of the total 2025<\/th><\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
rapidasig.md<\/td>23800<\/td>99%<\/td>26186<\/td>90%<\/td> <\/tr>\n
intact.md<\/td>358<\/td>67%<\/td>1600<\/td>52%<\/td> <\/tr>\n
iasig.md<\/td>241<\/td>100%<\/td>402<\/td>29%<\/td> <\/tr>\n
moldasig.md<\/td>620<\/td>59%<\/td>829<\/td>69%<\/td> <\/tr>\n
grawe.md<\/td>952<\/td>67%<\/td>783<\/td>71%<\/td> <\/tr>\n
asterra.md<\/td>23<\/td>5%<\/td>0<\/td>0%<\/td> <\/tr>\n
omnis.md<\/td>102<\/td>75%<\/td>3314<\/td>95%<\/td> <\/tr>\n
general.md<\/td>359<\/td>97%<\/td>227<\/td>63%<\/td> <\/tr>\n
donaris.md<\/td>131<\/td>6%<\/td>438<\/td>83%<\/td> <\/tr>\n
acordgrup.md<\/td>37<\/td>100%<\/td>23<\/td>21%<\/td> <\/tr>\n
rca.md<\/td>4700<\/td>0%<\/td>1463<\/td>98%<\/td> <\/tr>\n
garantie.md<\/td>68<\/td>71%<\/td>37<\/td>77%<\/td> <\/tr>\n
arion.md<\/td>331<\/td>100%<\/td>186<\/td>95%<\/td> <\/tr>\n
totalasig.md<\/td>15<\/td>100%<\/td>2200<\/td>100%<\/td> <\/tr>\n
globalasig.md<\/td>1500<\/td>100%<\/td>960<\/td>100%<\/td> <\/tr>\n
strahovanie.md<\/td>136<\/td>100%<\/td>110<\/td>100%<\/td> <\/tr>\n
sunexpress.md<\/td>20<\/td>100%<\/td>42<\/td>100%<\/td> <\/tr>\n
elitasig.md<\/td>30<\/td>100%<\/td>30<\/td>100%<\/td> <\/tr>\n
bnaa.md<\/td>31<\/td>100%<\/td>29<\/td>100%<\/td> <\/tr>\n
superpolis.md<\/td>427<\/td>100%<\/td>26<\/td>100%<\/td> <\/tr>\n <\/tbody>\n <\/table>\n \n \n \n<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n

For clarity, the organic traffic volume data is displayed in a pie chart to illustrate who is capturing the largest share.
<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Top 10 websites capturing organic traffic from Google search
<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n
\n
\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n <\/div>\n
\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n <\/div>\n
\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n <\/div>\n
\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n <\/div>\n
\n
<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n<\/div>\n